By Elizabeth A Coonan
On November 15, 2013, the Supreme
Court of Iowa in Staff Management and New Hampshire Insurance v. Jimenez
ruled that the Iowa Workers’ Compensation Commissioner can award an
undocumented worker healing period benefits under the Iowa Workers’
Compensation Act. Using the doctrine of
“expression unis est exlusio alterius” (don’t worry, we had to look it up too)
as standing for the proposition that legislative intent is expressed by
omission as well as by inclusion, the Court determined that the definition of
“employee” under section 85.61(11) of the Iowa Workers’ Compensation Act is to
be read in a broad manner. The court reasoned, “If the legislature intended the
definition of a worker or employee to exclude undocumented workers, it would
have done so by adding undocumented workers to the list of excluded workers or
employees.”
It should be noted that this case
dealt only with the issue of entitlement to workers’ compensation benefits, not
whether the employer had a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for terminating
the undocumented employee. The employee advanced an argument indicating that
the employer was aware that she was undocumented when the employee was
initially hired. Legally and strategically, this left the employer with no
choice but to argue that it was not aware of her lack of work authorization as
the knowing employment of an individual not authorized to work in the United
States comes with significant risk of fines and penalties. The moral of this story: Once you have
knowledge that a workers is undocumented, you may not continue to employ that individual but
he or she may still be entitled to receive workers’ compensation benefits in the
State of Iowa .
If you have questions about
workers’ compensation or immigration compliance, contact your BrownWinick
employment law attorney.
No comments:
Post a Comment